Solutions · AI Governance
Continuous technical governance, backed by runtime evidence
Static policy documents do not show whether controls operate. CydraGovern classifies AI systems, maps controls across frameworks and links them to evidence generated by real gateway decisions.
The challenge
What teams tell us they face
For: CROs, compliance leads, governance managers and internal audit
- New AI systems appear faster than governance reviews can classify them.
- Frameworks such as the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI RMF overlap but use different language.
- Audit evidence is gathered manually and goes stale.
- Exceptions are granted without expiry or ownership.
The approach
How CydraLabs helps
Step 1
Classify
Record EU AI Act risk tier and internal criticality for each AI system (Beta).
Step 2
Map controls
Use representative control mappings across EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 27001, GDPR, DORA, NIS2 and SOC 2 (Beta).
Step 3
Collect evidence
Link evidence records from the gateway to the controls they demonstrate.
Step 4
Remediate
Track gaps, time-bound exceptions and remediation tasks with owners.
Products
Products involved
CydraGovern
Turn runtime decisions into continuous compliance evidence.
Learn more about CydraGovernCydraGateway
Decide before tools execute — allow, deny or require approval.
Learn more about CydraGateway